2025 WHO-Funded Study..Linking Cell Phone Radiation to Cancer in Animals (ICBE-EMF Press Release)

Before reading, keep in mind that there are thousands of studies to see regarding harm that EMFs can cause us.  Also keep in mind that EVERY cellphone contract that is signed contains, in the small print, a message saying that your cellphone exceeds the safety limits for RF radiation levels as soon as you touch it (or get within a handful of mm depending on the type of phone).

So finally even the WHO gets back involved in studying the hidden elephant in the room and making actual contributions to the over abundance of science already on the subject.  Read below:

 

Media Contact

communications@icbe-emf.org

 

April 28, 2025

 

Press release

 

New WHO-Funded Study Reports High Certainty of the Evidence Linking Cell Phone Radiation to Cancer in Animals

 

Scientific Experts Urge the FCC to Establish Science-Based Exposure Limits to Address Wireless Health Risks

 

Environment International has published a new systematic review, partially funded by the World Health Organization, concluding that there is high certainty of the evidence linking cell phone radiofrequency (RF) radiation to two types of cancer in animals. In response, leading scientists from the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF) are calling for immediate policy action to protect public health and the environment, warning that further delay could have serious consequences amid the global surge in the use of wireless communication devices.

 

What the Review Found

 

A new systematic review of 52 animal studies, “Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure on Cancer in Laboratory Animal Studies” by Mevissen et al. (2025), concluded there is high certainty of the evidence linking RF radiation exposure to two types of tumors: gliomas in the brain and malignant schwannomas in the heart. Notably, the same types of tumors have also been observed in human studies, adding significant confidence that the associations observed in human studies are real.

 

The review also found moderate certainty of evidence of an increased risk of rare tumors, such as pheochromocytomas in the adrenal glands and hepatoblastomas in the liver. Additionally, some studies indicated a possible association with lymphomas, although the findings were inconsistent.

 

ICBE-EMF highlights that in 2011, the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified radiofrequency radiation (RF-EMF) as a Group 2B “possible” human carcinogen, noting limited animal evidence. Since then, major animal studies — including those by the U.S. National Toxicology Program and the Ramazzini Institute — have found that RF radiation exposure causes cancer in rats.

 

The new WHO-funded review, concluding there is “high certainty” animal evidence of cancer causation, reinforces calls for IARC to urgently reevaluate the cancer classification of RF radiation.

 

Given this high level of certainty, government policymakers worldwide should immediately move to revise their RF radiation exposure limits to protect public health and the environment.

 

Statements by Experts of the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields 

 

“The evidence is now clear —cell phone radiation can cause cancer in animals in concordance with the tumor types identified in human studies of mobile phone users. As animal studies are essential for predicting cancer risk in humans, governments should develop science-based safety standards to protect human health. The conclusion of the study commissioned by the WHO shows that the long-standing assumption current government limits are based on  — that cell phone RF radiation can only cause harm through tissue heating — is wrong” stated Ron Melnick, PhD, Chair of the ICBE-EMF and former senior toxicologist and Director of Special Programs at the National Toxicology Program and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS).

 

“The preponderance of the research published since 1996 finds adverse biologic and health effects from long-term exposure to low levels of modulated or pulsed wireless RF radiation. Given the widespread global usage of wireless among users of all ages, even a very small increase in the incidence of disease will have broad implications for public health,” stated said Joel Moskowitz, PhD, Director of the Center for Family and Community Health at the School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, also an ICBE-EMF member.

 

“To protect public health and the environment, exposure to cell phone and wireless radiation must be significantly reduced,” said Elizabeth Kelley, Managing Director of ICBE-EMF. She referenced the EMF Scientist Appeal now signed by 267 scientists from 45 nations. “Hundreds of scientists worldwide agree that current exposure limits are outdated and do not adequately protect against health risks.”

ICBE-EMF emphasizes that governments must act immediately to strengthen regulatory limits on wireless radiation to protect public health. Wildlife exposures must be mitigated. Current exposure standards, based on outdated assumptions, do not reflect the scientific evidence linking RF radiation to cancer and other health effects.

ICBE-EMF also highlights practical steps the public can take to reduce exposure — such as using speakerphone or wired headsets, keeping devices away from the body, and limiting wireless use among children — but stresses that personal actions are not a substitute for government-enforced safety standards. Stronger, science-based regulations are urgently needed to address the widespread and increasing exposure to wireless radiation.

WHO Commissioned Study on RF Radiation and Cancer in Animals

Mevissen M, Ducray A, Ward JM, Kopp-Schneider A, McNamee JP, Wood AW, Rivero TM, Straif K. Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure on cancer in laboratory animal studies, a systematic review. Environment International. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2025.109482.

Video of Dr. Ronald Melnick on the Cell Phone Wireless Radiation Animal Cancer Study

Video of Elizabeth Kelley on the Cell Phone Radiation Animal Cancer Study.

Press release online at ICBE-EMF here.

About the ICBE-EMF 

ICBE-EMF is an international consortium of scientists, doctors and researchers with expertise and peer-reviewed publications on the biological and health effects of electromagnetic fields including wireless RF radiation. Wireless devices such as cell phones, cordless phones, Wi-Fi and cell towers emit radiofrequency (RF) radiation.

ICBE-EMF recently published major scientific papers concluding that current government safety limits for wireless radiation are not protective of public health and highlighting engineering solutions that could dramatically reduce radiation emissions from cell phones.

The Commission is committed to upholding the highest standards of scientific research and makes science-based recommendations to ensure the protection of the public and environment. icbe-emf.org

 

This press release is online at https://icbe-emf.org/who-funded-study-reports-high-certainty-of-the-evidence-linking-cell-phone-radiation-to-cancer-in-animals/

EMF – SLEEP STUDY

EMF Radiation affects sleep in humans but can be addressed

Study performed by staff of EMF Solutions and results below written by Cory Hillis, President of EMF Solutions & EMF Specialist.

Abstract:  Good sleep should be considered at the top of the list of important factors in achieving a healthy life.  If a person does sleep well, it is argued that they’re unable to achieve the best health possible.  When sleep is a problem daily fatigue often results, making everything harder to do or harder to achieve in a person’s life, including the steps a body can take to get or remain in good health.

Many things happen during “good sleep” including production of much of the next day’s adrenaline, healing and repairing mechanisms, and more.

There have already been several studies demonstrating that EMF radiation has effects on the ability of people to sleep well, dream deeply, or feel rested upon waking up in the morning.  One example is a recent study showing that a 2.45 GHz frequency from a baby monitor can have effects on how well babies and children sleep.  But similar EMF radiation has been shown to affect every age from children to adults almost countless studies. 

The mechanism by which EMF radiation can have effects on people, including sleep, has been studied and it has been theorized as a VGCC problem.  EMF radiation effects people via these VGCCs, or “Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels.” It has been shown that EMFs from common household devices cause these intracellular, double-ion calcium channels (VGCCs) to malfunction, which then causes them to open and remain open.  This leads to an overabundance of double ion calcium molecules inside of the cell which has significant effects on our cell health and our overall health according to Dr Martin Pall and other Biochemists.  Dr Pall explains how this process likely how fatigue and worsening sleep result, and possibly how all biological effects and symptoms arise from EMF exposure.

This study has shown that by properly addressing the VGCC issue, subjects are significantly more likely to experience noticeably better sleep and often more energy (less fatigue) as well.  Moreover, of all of the testimonials given by addressing the EMFs and the VGCC issue, better sleep was by far the most common.

Terminology:

ELF:  “Extremely low frequency” which is usually from electricity which in the US is 60 Hertz.  ELF can go up to 300 Hz.

EMF:  Electromagnetic Frequency.  It is a term for all radiation including ionic, the higher frequency radiation as well as the lower frequency, non-ionic radiation.  Often when people use the term they refer to the non-ionic radiation such as the common household radiation of microwaves and radio waves. 

Low frequency radiation:  X-ray, gamma rays, and nuclear power are super high frequencies called ionic radiation which starts at about 1,000 trillions of waves per second, a quadrillion.  Lower frequency radiation is considered anything under that frequency which includes microwaves, radiowaves, and other frequencies often in the billions of waves per second (Hertz) and below.

Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels:  Double ion calcium channels on nearly every cell in the human body.  It has been theorized and shown that these are the mechanism in which the low frequency radiation (EMF) can affect human cells and ultimately people as a whole. 

Introduction:

There are thousands of studies and research articles showing how EMF radiation from household devices can affect the health of humans.  One of the most common symptoms claimed is having worse sleep.  Having fatigue or “less energy” is the second most common symptom observed.  It is believed that the most credible science explaining how EMFs are affecting people comes from research by scientists on the Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels (VGCCs).  It’s been shown that VGCCs malfunction when in the presence of low frequency EMF radiation as well as around low frequency ELF as well. According to Biochemists such as Dr Martin Pall, this malfunction can and likely does explain all of the symptoms and biological effects of low frequency EMF radiation.

In normal conditions, without EMFs, the VGCC activation happens when there is a voltage change, or an electrical pressure differential from the outside versus the inside of a human cell.  It is normally this change that triggers the channel to open and allow calcium ions to enter a cell. 

Diagram 1:  VGCC Activation of Cellular membrane

EMFs are causing a malfunction to occur, causing the channel to open when it should not be, when there is no voltage change.  It has been shown in studies that the calcium levels can double or even triple the levels in a short time around radio waves such as a Wi-Fi router.   See Diagram 2.

Diagram 2:  EMF activation of VGCCs – process explained

EMF Solutions claims to address the root cause of EMFs.  If successful their products would have to demonstrate that they also addressed or fixed the calcium channel malfunction.   In a 2021 independent laboratory study, EMF Solutions products became the first to show they did that, restoring the levels of calcium in human cells back to normal with a perfect probability “p” value = 0.001 in their study.    

This study set out to test if the Calcium Channel is fixed could the most common symptom, worse sleep, also be addressed by using EMF Solutions’ products?

Twenty subjects were picked randomly to have EMF radiation remediated by EMF Solutions.  It turns out all were adults.  Five of them were doctors or holistic practitioners.  Thirteen were female and seven were male.  All of them had their entire home remediated according to the EMF Solutions’ protocol which consisted of  a Home Harmonizer on the electric meter, Better ZZZs under the bed mattress, Device Chips on Wi-Fi routers and printers, Cell Chips on cell phones, Laptop Chips on laptops and tablets, and a personal protection product to wear when they were not home.  The personal protection products were either the XL Band or the XXL Card. 

All subjects had a Wi-Fi router, a cell phone, and a “Smart” electric meter on the outside of their homes.  All of these emit radio wave radiation which has been shown in studies to affect sleep.

Twenty-two people were chosen randomly but two with extraordinary EMF circumstances were excluded from participating because they either had Solar Panels on the home or were living within a block of a cell tower or XL powerlines. 

After remediation subjects were asked if they had experienced or noticed anything different.  They were asked this between the first and seventh day of installation.  No suggestions were made as to what they might feel differently before versus after using the products.  It was an open-ended question with no multiple choice given.  This design would suppress not enhance the number of sleep related testimonials yet still there were significant results.

Discussion & Conclusions:

55% of the subjects reported better sleep and 45% of those subjects also reported feeling more energy.  This was by far the most common testimonial.  Some of those reporting better sleep reported having a sleep issue before installation, but many did not report having any sleep issues prior to installation.  It stands to reason that many people’s sleep is being affected by EMFs but they have not recognized this fact yet.

Other less common observed effects were a feeling of calmness plus better memory and mental clarity. 

These results were significant, and further studies should be conducted which should include a study on people who already claim to have sleep issues to see how many might be partially or solely because of household EMF radiation.  Another study is planned to use a sleep monitoring device, such as a Fitbit, for more statistical data as well. 

References: 

  1. Nicole Bijlsma, Russell Conduit, Gerard Kennedy, Marc Cohen.  Does radiofrequency radiation impact sleep?  A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover pilot study.  Front Public Health 2024, Oct 19.  doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1481537.  PMCID: PMC11554657  PMID: 39534742 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • Itani O, Jike M, Watanabe N, Kaneita Y. Short sleep duration and health outcomes: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Sleep Med. (2017) 32:246–56. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2016.08.006, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Walker MP, Stickgold R. Sleep, memory, and plasticity. Annu Rev Psychol. (2006) 57:139–66. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Marino C, Andrade B, Campisi SC, Wong M, Zhao H, Jing X, et al. Association between disturbed sleep and depression in children and youths: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. JAMA Netw Open. (2021) 4:e212373–3. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.2373, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pall ML. Microwave frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) produce widespread neuropsychiatric effects including depression. J Chem Neuroanat. (2016) 75:43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2015.08.001, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hutter HP, Moshammer H, Wallner P, Kundi M. Subjective symptoms, sleeping problems, and cognitive performance in subjects living near mobile phone base stations. Occup Environ Med. (2006) 63:307–13. doi: 10.1136/oem.2005.020784, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ohayon MM, Stolc V, Freund FT, Milesi C, Sullivan SS. The potential for impact of man-made super low and extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on sleep. Sleep Med Rev. (2019) 47:28–38. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2019.06.001, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fritzer G, Göder R, Friege L, Wachter J, Hansen V, Hinze-Selch D, et al. Effects of short-and long-term pulsed radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on night sleep and cognitive functions in healthy subjects. Bioelectromagnetics. (2007) 28:316–25. doi: 10.1002/bem.20301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Loughran SP, McKenzie RJ, Jackson ML, Howard ME, Croft RJ. Individual differences in the effects of mobile phone exposure on human sleep: rethinking the problem. Bioelectromagnetics. (2012) 33:86–93. doi: 10.1002/bem.20691, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  1. Lustenberger C, Murbach M, Tüshaus L, Wehrle F, Kuster N, Achermann P, et al. Inter-individual and intra-individual variation of the effects of pulsed RF EMF exposure on the human sleep EEG. Bioelectromagnetics. (2015) 36:169–77. doi: 10.1002/bem.21893 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  1. Tettamanti G, Auvinen A, Åkerstedt T, Kojo K, Ahlbom A, Heinävaara S, et al. Long-term effect of mobile phone use on sleep quality: results from the cohort study of mobile phone use and health (COSMOS). Environ Int. (2020) 140:105687. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105687, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  1. Vecsei Z, Knakker B, Juhász P, Thuróczy G, Trunk A, Hernádi I. Short-term radiofrequency exposure from new generation mobile phones reduces EEG alpha power with no effects on cognitive performance. Sci Rep. (2018) 8:18010. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36353-9, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  1. Hamblin DL, Wood AW. Effects of mobile phone emissions on human brain activity and sleep variables. Int J Radiat Biol. (2002) 78:659–69. doi: 10.1080/09553000210132298, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  1. Höhn C, Schmid SR, Plamberger CP, Bothe K, Angerer M, Gruber G, et al. Preliminary results: the impact of smartphone use and short-wavelength light during the evening on circadian rhythm, sleep and alertness. Clocks & Sleep. (2021) 3:66–86. doi: 10.3390/clockssleep3010005, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  1. Pedersen J, Rasmussen MGB, Olesen LG, Kristensen PL, Grøntved A. Feasibility of self-administered electroencephalography-based sleep assessment in children and adults: Data from the SCREENS pilot trial (PREPRINT) Sleep Sci. Pract. Vol. Version 1 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  1. Lowden A, Åkerstedt T, Ingre M, Wiholm C, Hillert L, Kuster N, et al. Sleep after mobile phone exposure in subjects with mobile phone-related symptoms. Bioelectromagnetics. (2011) 32:4–14. doi: 10.1002/bem.20609, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  1. Loughran SP, Verrender A, Dalecki A, Burdon CA, Tagami K, Park J, et al. Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and the resting EEG: exploring the thermal mechanism hypothesis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2019) 16:1505. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16091505, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  1. Röösli M, Frei P, Mohler E, Hug K. Systematic review on the health effects of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base stations. Bull World Health Organ. (2010) 88:887–896F. doi: 10.2471/blt.09.071852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  1. Danker-Hopfe H, Bueno-Lopez A, Dorn H, Schmid G, Hirtl R, Eggert T. Spending the night next to a router–results from the first human experimental study investigating the impact of Wi-fi exposure on sleep. Int J Hyg Environ Health. (2020) 228:113550. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113550, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Force AT. A preliminary report from the sleep disorders atlas task Force of the American sleep disorders association. Sleep. (1992) 15:174–84. doi: 10.1093/sleep/15.2.174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Glioblastoma in 15-39 year-olds: 230% increase in 20 years! – Article

Will you trust yourself and your kids with unprotected Cell Phones? Read about new studies.

By : Phonegate Team • 9 Mar 2025
Categories : Health, Press releases, Science
Tags : Brain cancer, Cancer, Cell Phone, Glioblastoma, Santé Publique France

Phonegate Alert notes with the utmost attention the publication on March 3, 2025 of a study by Santé Publique France (SPF) on the incidence of cancers in adolescents and young adults (AYA) aged 15 to 39. This report reveals a worrying increase in glioblastoma (serious brain cancer) in this age group, with a significant rise of +6.11% per year over the period studied (2000-2020). This represents an overall increase of around 233% over 20 years!

Glioblastoma: Red alert among young people

This increase is particularly alarming, as it contrasts with trends observed for other types of cancer. While the overall incidence of cancers in the AYA population has seen an increase followed by stabilization (or even a slight decrease), the continuing rise in glioblastomas stands out. With regard to central nervous system (CNS) tumours in general, the study also highlights the need to interpret the data with caution due to various potential biases, but the specific increase in glioblastomas remains a major cause for concern.

The trend is accelerating: alarming!

In a report published in 2018, Santé Publique France noted a 4-fold increase in the number of glioblastomas in 30 years (i.e. a 300% increase over the period 1990-2018). Although a direct comparison is tricky, a cautious extrapolation of the increase in the AYA population over 30 years suggests that the trend may have accelerated further.

As SPF explains in this new report:

“…the increase in glioblastomas (+ 6.11% per year in this study) has already been observed in the report on the evolution of incidence between 1990 and 2018 [25] in which the incidence of histologically confirmed glioblastomas increased by + 3.6% per year in men and + 3.3% per year in women (all ages combined).”

Phonegate Alert once again sounds the alarm

This new study confirms the warnings that our NGO is constantly sounding concerning the potential risks associated with exposure to electromagnetic waves, particularly those emitted by cell phones.

“This study highlights the correlation in time between the massive use of smartphones by young people and the corresponding increase in glioblastomas. It also validates the alerts issued during the Phonegate scandal, which revealed overexposure to cell phone radiation during this period and even today,” says Dr. Marc Arazi, President of Phonegate Alert. He points to the responsibility of the public authorities and, above all, that of the cell phone industry.”

Glioblastoma: exposure to radio frequencies identified as a risk factor

The new SPF report again highlights, among known or suspected risk factors:

“ethnic origin, gender, family history of gliomas, genetic diseases, radiation or environmental exposures (particularly pesticides and electromagnetic fields), and medical imaging examinations delivering ionizing radiation [26-29].”

It’s time to act: our demands

Phonegate Alert insists on the need not to ignore this alarm signal and urges the health authorities to:

  • Strengthen independent research into the potential links between exposure to electromagnetic radiation and the development of glioblastoma in young adults and in the general population.
  • Better inform the public, and young people in particular, about the potential health risks (infertility, brain and central nervous system tumors) associated with the excessive and careless use of cell phones and other wave-emitting devices.
  • Immediately apply the precautionary principle to exposure to electromagnetic radiation, in particular by limiting exposure of children and adolescents.

Protect yourself: simple gestures

Phonegate Alert reminds us that simple, cost-free measures can be put in place to reduce exposure to waves from our smartphones, such as:

  • Use the speakerphone and hands-free kit.
  • Keep your phone away from your head and body at all times.
  • Avoid using the phone in areas where reception is poor.

ARTICLE END

Additional Protect yourself gestures

The most important way to protect yourself is to remediate the EMFs coming from your phone and the best technology with the most scientific proof (on human cells) comes from EMF Solutions. Here’s what we recommend:

Most Cell Phones –> Use one “Cell Chip

iPhones 12 thru 16+ –> Use one “iCell Chip

Google Pixel phones –> Use TWO “Cell Chips

EMFs Causing Mold to Grow FASTER

Many people have mold issues that come from their homes, cars, schools, and work. It might be important to know that radiation could cause mold to grow significantly FASTER when exposed to radiation. Dr Klinghardt often quotes the Switzerland scientist who showed an experiment where mold grew up to 600 times more mycotoxins when exposed to a household Wi-Fi router. Common sense says that this is likely true for other forms of microwave radiation such as: cell phones, gaming stations, ear buds, “smart” TVs, wireless printers, and any other similar, common, microwave or radiowave household radiation. Below is an article about mold growing faster around higher frequency radiation:

Article found at:

https://phys.org/news/2007-05-radiation-eating-fungi.html

May 23, 2007

Researchers discover ‘radiation-eating’ fungi

Scientists have long assumed that fungi exist mainly to decompose matter into chemicals that other organisms can then use. But researchers at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University have found evidence that fungi possess a previously undiscovered talent with profound implications: the ability to use radioactivity as an energy source for making food and spurring their growth.

“The fungal kingdom comprises more species than any other plant or animal kingdom, so finding that they’re making food in addition to breaking it down means that Earth’s energetics—in particular, the amount of radiation energy being converted to biological energy—may need to be recalculated,” says Dr. Arturo Casadevall, chair of microbiology & immunology at Einstein and senior author of the study, published May 23 in PLoS ONE.

The ability of fungi to live off radiation could also prove useful to people: “Since ionizing radiation is prevalent in outer space, astronauts might be able to rely on fungi as an inexhaustible food source on long missions or for colonizing other planets,” says Dr. Ekaterina Dadachova, associate professor of nuclear medicine and microbiology & immunology at Einstein and lead author of the study.

Those fungi able to “eat” radiation must possess melanin, the pigment found in many if not most fungal species. But up until now, melanin’s biological role in fungi—if any–has been a mystery.

“Just as the pigment chlorophyll converts sunlight into chemical energy that allows green plants to live and grow, our research suggests that melanin can use a different portion of the electromagnetic spectrum—ionizing radiation—to benefit the fungi containing it,” says Dr. Dadachova.

The research began five years ago when Dr. Casadevall read on the Web that a robot sent into the still-highly-radioactive damaged reactor at Chernobyl had returned with samples of black, melanin-rich fungi that were growing on the reactor’s walls. “I found that very interesting and began discussing with colleagues whether these fungi might be using the radiation emissions as an energy source,” says Dr. Casadevall.

To test this idea, the Einstein researchers performed a variety of in vivo tests using three genetically diverse fungi and four measures of cell growth. The studies consistently showed that ionizing radiation significantly enhances the growth of fungi that contain melanin.

For example, two types of fungi–one that was induced to make melanin (Crytococcus neoformans) and another that naturally contains it (Wangiella dermatitidis)—were exposed to levels of ionizing radiation approximately 500 times higher than background levels. Both species grew significantly faster (as measured by the number of colony forming units and dry weight) than when exposed to standard background radiation.

The researchers also carried out physico-chemical studies into melanin’s ability to capture radiation. By measuring the electron spin resonance signal after melanin was exposed to ionizing radiation, they showed that radiation interacts with melanin to alter its electron structure. This is an essential step for capturing radiation and converting it into a different form of energy to make food.

Dr. Casadevall notes that the melanin in fungi is no different chemically from the melanin in our skin. “It’s pure speculation but not outside the realm of possibility that melanin could be providing energy to skin cells,” he says. “While it wouldn’t be enough energy to fuel a run on the beach, maybe it could help you to open an eyelid.”

Source: Albert Einstein College of Medicine

EMF Solutions on Joni Table Talk show

Joni Table Talk is a wonderful show on Daystar TV that airs on many networks, including Daystar. Some of their top personnel, including producers, have gotten testimonials from using EMF Solutions’ products so they finally decided to invite our President, Cory Hillis, on to talk about it. Here’s the second time Cory appeared on Joni Table Talk.

This show covers Christian topics but also covers topics which Joni Lamb believes will help the physical, mental, or spiritual health of their listeners.

Watch this informative show on EMFs by clicking below –>

https://player.daystar.tv/2UTN5czN

HUMAN CELL & EMF STUDY –> Indep Lab shows cellular effects of EMFs can be nullified.

See the first and only one in history, a study by Dr Mazvita Maziveyi.  Until now, nobody has shown an actual solution for what happens in human cells when exposed to EMF radiation.  And this solution has a perfect Probability Value (in other words…it really works!)…

 

Reversal of EMF-Induced Calcium Dysregulation in Human Cells Using Remediation Devices

 

Maziveyi, M.

 

Abstract

 

Exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs), particularly from ubiquitous sources such as Wi-Fi

routers, has been shown to alter intracellular calcium levels via voltage-gated calcium channels

(VGCCs). This study evaluated the effects of EMF exposure on calcium levels in four human

cell lines—skin (BJ), liver (THLE-2), breast (MCF10A), and colon (HCEC)—and investigated

whether earth-based EMF remediation products from EMF Solutions could reverse these

changes. Using fluorescence-based calcium assays, calcium levels were assessed under three

conditions: control (no added EMFs), EMF exposure, and EMF exposure with remediation. EMF

exposure caused significant dysregulation of intracellular calcium levels in skin and breast cells.

The use of a Device Chip and XL Home Harmonizer Box normalized these alterations with a

significance level of p < 0.0001. No significant calcium fluctuations were observed in liver or

colon cells. These findings suggest that specific EMF remediation strategies may offer

protective benefits for cell types sensitive to EMF-induced calcium dysregulation.

 

 

Introduction

 

Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) are invisible areas of energy commonly associated with the use

of electrical power and various forms of natural and man-made lighting and communication

devices (EPA, 2024). EMFs exist across a broad spectrum, ranging from extremely low

frequency (ELF) radiation—such as that emitted by power lines—to higher frequency

radiofrequency (RF) radiation used in wireless communications, including Wi-Fi routers, mobile

phones, and Bluetooth devices (National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [NIEHS],

2020). Unlike ionizing radiation (e.g., X-rays, gamma rays), which has enough energy to remove

tightly bound electrons from atoms, non-ionizing radiation such as EMFs is considered less

harmful because it lacks this ionizing capacity (World Health Organization [WHO], 2022).

 

However, despite being classified as non-ionizing, EMFs are increasingly implicated in biological

effects that cannot be solely explained by traditional thermal or energetic models. Numerous

studies over the past two decades have reported biological changes associated with EMF

exposure, including oxidative stress, changes in DNA integrity, altered gene expression,

reduced sperm quality, and cellular signaling disruptions (Belpomme et al., 2018; Yakymenko et

al., 2016; BioInitiative Report, 2012). The World Health Organization’s International Agency for

Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as “possibly

carcinogenic to humans” (Group 2B), based on increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of

brain cancer, associated with wireless phone use (IARC, 2011).

 

One of the most compelling mechanisms proposed to explain the non-thermal biological effects

of EMFs involves the activation of voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs). VGCCs are

integral membrane proteins that allow the passage of calcium ions (Ca²⁺) into cells in response

to changes in membrane potential. These channels are crucial in regulating numerous

physiological processes including neurotransmission, hormone secretion, gene expression, and

cellular proliferation (Berridge, 2012).

 

Dr. Martin Pall has been a leading voice in this area, proposing that EMFs—particularly at low

frequencies—exert their effects by directly stimulating VGCCs, causing an abnormal influx of

calcium into the cell (Pall, 2013). His theory is supported by pharmacological studies in which

VGCC blockers significantly reduced or eliminated EMF-induced biological changes, including

calcium influx, oxidative stress, and DNA breaks (Pall, 2015). Among the VGCC subtypes,

L-type channels have shown the greatest susceptibility to EMF-induced activation, especially in

electrically excitable cells such as neurons and muscle tissue. Other subtypes, including N-type,

P/Q-type, and T-type VGCCs, have also been implicated, with some exhibiting decreased

intracellular calcium in response to EMF exposure, depending on the cellular context (Pall,

2013).

 

This calcium dysregulation may trigger a cascade of downstream effects, such as increased

production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), nitric oxide signaling abnormalities, mitochondrial

dysfunction, and alterations in transcriptional activity (Pall, 2015; Yakymenko et al., 2016).

These molecular disruptions may underlie the diverse health complaints reported by individuals

exposed to high levels of EMFs, ranging from headaches and sleep disturbances to more

chronic issues like infertility and neurodegeneration (Belpomme et al., 2018).

 

Despite accumulating evidence, the topic of EMF exposure remains controversial. Skeptics

argue that many reported effects stem from poorly controlled studies or are the result of nocebo

effects (i.e., negative health outcomes induced by the belief that EMFs are harmful) (Eltiti et al.,

2018; Schmidt et al., 2019; de Vocht, 2017; Dieudonné, 2016). Others point to a lack of

consistent epidemiological evidence linking EMFs with adverse health outcomes. Nevertheless,

the rapid global expansion of EMF-emitting devices has prompted increasing public concern

and a call for more robust studies, particularly those that investigate underlying biological

mechanisms and evaluate possible methods of remediation (WHO, 2022).

 

In this context, EMF Solutions has developed products designed to mitigate the biological

impact of EMFs using materials and designs said to harmonize electromagnetic frequencies at a

subatomic level. These include the Device Chip, which is affixed to power cords, and the XL

Home Harmonizer Box, which is designed to neutralize ambient EMFs within a broader

environment. According to EMF Solutions, EMFs are composed of photons traveling at the

speed of light. When these photons are absorbed by solid materials, they can induce both

thermal effects and what the company refers to as “subatomic chaos”—a phenomenon where

particles enter an excited state that disrupts normal subatomic organization. This subatomic

chaos is said to conduct especially well through metals and may be the true cause of

voltage-gated calcium channel (VGCC) malfunction, rather than the EMFs themselves. EMF

Solutions posits that its products address this subatomic disruption directly—not by blocking

EMFs, but by using natural materials to create quantum coherence and restore order at the

subatomic level.

 

The XL Home Harmonizer Box was selected specifically to address not only the EMF radiation

within the incubator but also ambient EMFs from external sources such as nearby cell towers,

SCADA poles, Wi-Fi routers, and other infrastructure in the vicinity that could influence the

experimental environment. The present study evaluates the effectiveness of these remediation

tools in restoring normal calcium signaling in human cells exposed to Wi-Fi-generated EMFs.

We hypothesized that if EMFs dysregulate calcium levels via VGCC activation, then effective

remediation would reverse this disruption and normalize intracellular calcium concentrations.

 

 

 

Methods 

 

Cell Culture Conditions

 

Four human cell lines were used in this study: BJ (human foreskin fibroblasts), MCF10A

(non-tumorigenic mammary epithelial cells), THLE-2 (liver epithelial cells), and HCEC (human

colon epithelial cells). Each cell line was cultured in its optimal growth medium to ensure healthy

and consistent proliferation during experimentation.

 

BJ cells are skin fibroblasts taken from foreskin of a neonatal male and were maintained in

Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS)

and 1% penicillin-streptomycin to support fibroblast growth and prevent bacterial contamination.

MCF10A breast epithelial cells were cultured in a 1:1 mixture of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle

Medium and Ham’s F12 (DMEM/F12), supplemented with 5% horse serum, 20 ng/mL epidermal

growth factor (EGF), 10 µg/mL insulin, 0.5 µg/mL hydrocortisone, 100 ng/mL cholera toxin, and

1% penicillin-streptomycin. THLE-2 liver epithelial cells were cultured in Bronchial Epithelial Cell

Growth Medium (BEGM), based on LHC-9 or BEGM BulletKit formulations, with additional

supplementation of 5 ng/mL EGF and 70 ng/mL phosphoethanolamine, as per ATCC guidelines.

This medium is serum-free and designed to support the growth of non-transformed liver

epithelial cells.

 

HCEC colon epithelial cells were cultured in DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% FBS, 5 µg/mL

insulin, 5 µg/mL transferrin, and 10 ng/mL EGF. Depending on the cell line variant, additional

supplements such as hydrocortisone or cholera toxin were included as needed. All cells were

incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO₂.

 

Experimental Design

 

Three experimental conditions were applied to each cell type (Figure 1):

 

  1. Test #1 – Control (No Added EMFs):

Cells incubated without additional EMF exposure.

 

  1. Test #2 – EMF Exposure:

Wi-Fi router placed 12 inches from cell culture trays for 24 hours.

 

  1. Test #3 – EMF + Remediation:

Same EMF exposure as Test #2, with two remediation devices:

 

○ Device Chip: Attached to the router’s power cord.

 

○ XL Home Harmonizer Box: Placed adjacent to the incubator.

Calcium Quantification Assay

 

Intracellular calcium levels were measured using a fluorometric calcium quantification assay

based on a red-fluorescent calcium-binding probe. This method is designed for sensitive

detection of calcium ions in in vitro samples and is compatible with cells cultured directly in

microplate wells.

 

For each condition (control, EMF-exposed, and EMF-exposed with remediation), cells were

cultured directly in a black-walled, clear-bottom 96-well microplate. Following incubation under

the respective experimental conditions, the cells were lysed in situ to produce solution-based

samples suitable for calcium quantification. A reaction mix containing the calcium-sensitive

fluorescent probe was then added directly to the wells. The plate was incubated at room

temperature for 30 minutes, and fluorescence intensity was measured using a microplate reader

set to an excitation/emission wavelength of approximately 540/590 nm.

 

This assay offers a broad dynamic range (30 µM to 1 mM) and can detect calcium

concentrations as low as 0.03 mM. The procedure does not require separation or wash steps

and was completed within 30 minutes. All samples were analyzed in octuplicate, and mean

fluorescence values were used for comparing calcium levels across conditions.

 

 

Statistical Analysis

 

One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test was used to compare calcium levels across

groups. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

 

 

 

Results

 

Exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from a Wi-Fi router significantly affected intracellular

calcium levels in some cell types, but not in others, as shown in Figure 2.

In skin (BJ) cells, exposure to EMFs resulted in a significant influx of calcium into the cells,

indicating that EMFs can disrupt calcium homeostasis in skin/fibroblast cells. The application of

the remediation techniques—specifically the Device Chip and Home Harmonizer—effectively

restored intracellular calcium levels to baseline, suggesting that these products can reverse

EMF-induced calcium dysregulation. The reversal was highly statistically significant, with a

p-value of ****p < 0.0001, indicating the highest confidence in the data (Figure 2A).

 

In breast (MCF10A) cells, EMF exposure caused a significant efflux of calcium, lowering

intracellular calcium levels compared to the control group. After the application of the same

remediation products, intracellular calcium levels were significantly increased, although the

levels did not fully return to baseline values. Despite this partial restoration, the statistical

significance of the increase was extremely high, with a p-value of ****p < 0.0001, indicating the

highest confidence in the effect of the remediation strategy in reversing the EMF-induced

calcium imbalance (Figure 2B).

 

In liver (THLE-2) cells, EMF exposure did not cause any significant change in intracellular

calcium levels compared to the control group, indicating that liver cells may be less sensitive to

the effects of EMFs on calcium homeostasis. Similarly, the application of the remediation

products (Device Chip and Home Harmonizer) did not significantly alter calcium levels in these

cells. The p-value for the comparison between the different conditions was p > 0.05, indicating

no statistically significant difference in calcium levels (Figure 2C).

 

Similarly, colon (HCEC) cells showed no significant changes in intracellular calcium levels due

to EMF exposure. Remediation did not significantly affect calcium levels in these cells either,

with a p > 0.05, indicating no significant difference across the conditions (Figure 2D).

 

These results, illustrated in Figure 2, suggest that the impact of EMFs on calcium homeostasis

is cell type-specific. Skin and breast cells were notably affected by EMF exposure and showed

significant improvements with the application of remediation techniques, while liver and colon

cells did not demonstrate significant changes, either with EMF exposure or with the remediation

strategies.

 

 

Discussion

 

This study confirms that electromagnetic fields (EMFs) emitted from common household

devices—specifically Wi-Fi routers—disrupt calcium homeostasis in human cells. Notably, we

observed a cell-type-specific directional shift in calcium concentration: an increase in skin cells

and a decrease in breast epithelial cells. This differential response supports the hypothesis that

VGCC (voltage-gated calcium channel) subtypes and expression profiles vary between cell

types and mediate distinct susceptibilities to EMF exposure.

 

To investigate potential remediation, we evaluated two products developed by EMF Solutions:

the Device Chip and the XL Home Harmonizer Box. According to EMF Solutions, EMFs consist

of photons traveling at the speed of light. Upon interaction with solid materials, these photons

are thought to induce not only thermal effects but also what the company terms subatomic

chaos—a phenomenon in which particles enter excited states, disrupting subatomic structure

and coherence. This subatomic chaos is said to propagate especially efficiently through

conductive materials like metal. EMF Solutions suggests that this secondary phenomenon—not

the EMFs themselves—triggers VGCC dysfunction, leading to abnormal calcium signaling. The

Device Chip and Harmonizer are not designed to block EMFs but instead aim to restore

quantum coherence through natural materials that stabilize subatomic organization.

 

The XL Home Harmonizer Box was selected for its capacity to address both local and ambient

EMF radiation, extending beyond the incubator environment to include external sources such as

cell towers, SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) infrastructure, neighboring Wi-Fi

routers, and other forms of pervasive electromagnetic pollution. In combination with the Device

Chip, which was affixed to the power cords of equipment within the experimental setup, these

tools were hypothesized to counteract EMF-induced biological effects at the subatomic level.

 

Our findings support this hypothesis. When applied, both remediation devices effectively

reversed the calcium imbalances observed in skin and breast epithelial cells. This reversal

suggests that the products may alter the electromagnetic environment in a way that reduces

inappropriate VGCC activation or inhibition. Interestingly, liver and colon epithelial cells—both of

which are located deeper within the body and typically shielded by overlying tissue—did not

exhibit significant calcium fluctuations in response to EMF exposure or remediation. This may

indicate either limited EMF penetration in vivo or different VGCC compositions that confer

resistance to EMF-induced effects.

 

These results align with a growing body of evidence indicating that EMFs, though non-ionizing,

can exert significant biological influence, particularly through disruption of calcium signaling

pathways. More importantly, our data suggest that strategic mitigation using

coherent-energy-based technologies may provide a viable method to restore homeostasis in

EMF-sensitive cell types. While further research is needed to confirm these findings in vivo and

to dissect the precise molecular interactions involved, this study offers preliminary support for

the potential of subatomic-level EMF remediation.

 

 

Conclusion

 

Exposure to EMFs from a Wi-Fi router caused significant calcium dysregulation in skin-exposed

human cells. Earth-based EMF remediation tools from EMF Solutions successfully reversed

these disruptions. These findings highlight the need for further investigation into EMF mitigation

and its potential role in promoting cellular health.

 

 

 

 

References:

 

  • Belpomme, D., Irigaray, P., Hardell, L., Clary, J., Belyaev, I., & Lebar, P. (2018). Thermal

and non-thermal health effects of low intensity non-ionizing radiation: An international

perspective. Environmental Pollution, 242, 643–658.

 

  • BioInitiative Working Group. (2012). BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for a

Biologically-based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF).

 

  • Berridge, M. J. (2012). Calcium signalling remodelling and disease. Biochemical Society

Transactions, 40(2), 297–309.

 

  • de Vocht, F. (2017). Commentary: The illusion of evidence—Are EMF symptoms real?

Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 27(4), 403–404.

https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2017.3

 

  • Dieudonné, M. (2016). Does electromagnetic hypersensitivity originate from nocebo

responses? Indications from a qualitative study. Bioelectromagnetics, 37(1), 14–24.

https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.21937

 

  • Eltiti, S., Wallace, D., Zougkou, K., Russo, R., Joseph, S., Rasor, P., … & Fox, E. (2018).

Does electromagnetic hypersensitivity originate from nocebo responses? Evidence from

a provocation study. Bioelectromagnetics, 39(3), 192–202.

https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.22117

 

  • EPA. (2024). Non-Ionizing Radiation From Wireless Technology. U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/radtown

 

  • Foster, K. R., & Rubin, G. J. (2014). Can exposure to EMF cause symptoms? EMF

Health Journal, 13(4), 123–131.

 

  • IARC. (2011). IARC classifies radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly

carcinogenic to humans. International Agency for Research on Cancer, WHO.

 

  • NIEHS. (2020). Electric and Magnetic Fields. National Institute of Environmental Health

Sciences. https://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/emf/index.cfm

 

  • Pall, M. L. (2013). Electromagnetic fields act via activation of voltage-gated calcium

channels to produce beneficial or adverse effects. Journal of Cellular and Molecular

Medicine, 17(8), 958–965.

 

  • Pall, M. L. (2015). Microwave frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) produce

widespread neuropsychiatric effects including depression. Journal of Chemical

Neuroanatomy, 75, 43–51.

  • Schmidt, B., Brugger, P., & Landolt, H. P. (2019). Nocebo effects after watching TV

reports about electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 118,

54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.01.007

 

  • WHO. (2022). Radiation: Electromagnetic fields. World Health Organization.

 

  • Yakymenko, I., Tsybulin, O., Sidorik, E., Henshel, D., Kyrylenko, S., & Kyrylenko, O.

(2016). Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency

radiation. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 35(2), 186–202.

 

Shocking short Video on how many Starlink Satellites have gone up in a few years.

We cannot confirm that this is the actual video but stars are flying by so who knows. But this is probably exactly what it does look like to see over 5,500 Starlink Low Orbit 5G Satellites being added around our earth in just a few short years.

These could be the greatest EMF problem that we all face because of: 1 – the strength of the satellites, 2 – the much higher frequencies (24 GHz and up, or 24,000,000,000 frequency and higher), 3 – sheer high numbers of satellites (remember there are 28 other companies with satellite programs planned or already going as well).

Get a Free Home Test

Contact us regarding any concerns or inquiries.

"*" indicates required fields

Country*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.