lastest-post-main-image

“Health Impact of 5G” – by the European Parliamentary Research Service

As we often say there are over 10,000 studies and research papers proving that EMFs are harmful to humans. It is beyond proven. Here’s another good source with thousands of studies being reviewed by the Parliamentary Research Service recently. See the entire 198 page study by using the link below. But here are some of the highlighted conclusions and observations from the study if you don’t have time to read a long study…note the key findings in BOLD & UNDERLINED below:

6.0 Results of the present review
Using PubMed and the EMF Portal database, and applying the scoping review methodology to our research, we found 950 papers on the carcinogenicity of RF-EMF in humans, and 911 papers on experimental rodent studies, totaling 1 861 studies. Regarding reproductive/developmental studies, we found 2 834 papers for epidemiology and 5 052 studies for experimental rodent studies, totaling 7 886 studies. From the present review of the literature and the considerations reported above, we come to the following conclusions:

6.1 Cancer in humans
FR1 (450 to 6,000 MHz):
there is limited evidence for carcinogenicity of RF radiation in humans. Updating the results of the overall 2011 evaluation to 2020, positive associations have again been observed between exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wireless phones and both glioma (tumor of the brain) and acoustic neuroma, but the human evidence is still limited.
FR2 (24 to 100 GHz): no adequate studies were performed on the effects of the higher frequencies.

6.2 Cancer in experimental animals
FR1 (450 to 6,000 MHz):
there is sufficient evidence in experimental animals of the carcinogenicity of RF radiation. New studies following the 2011 IARC evaluation showed a positive association between RF-EMF and tumors of the brain and Schwann cells of the peripheral nervous system, the same type of tumors also observed in epidemiological studies.
FR2 (24 to 100 GHz): no adequate studies were performed on the higher frequencies.

6.3 Reproductive/developmental effects in humans
FR1 (450 to 6,000 MHz):
there is sufficient evidence of adverse effects on the fertility of men. There is limited evidence of adverse effects on fertility in women. There is limited evidence of developmental effects in the offspring of mothers who were heavy users of mobile phones during pregnancy.
FR2 (24 to 100 GHz): no adequate studies were performed on the higher frequencies.

6.4 Reproductive/developmental effects in experimental animals
FR1 (450 to 6000 MHz): there is sufficient evidence of adverse effects on male rat and mouse fertility. There is limited evidence of adverse effects on female mouse fertility. There is limited evidence of adverse effects on the development in offspring of rats and mice exposed during embryo life. FR2 (24 to 100 GHz): no adequate studies on non-thermal effects were performed on the higher frequencies.

Overall evaluation

7.1 Cancer
FR1 (450 to 6 000 MHz): These FR1 frequencies are probably carcinogenic to humans.
FR2 (24 to 100 GHz): no adequate studies were performed on the higher frequencies.

7.2 Reproductive/developmental effects
FR1 (450 to 6000 MHz): These frequencies clearly affect male fertility. They possibly affect female fertility. They possibly have adverse effects on the development of embryos, fetuses and newborns.
FR2 (24 to 100 GHz): no adequate studies were performed on non-thermal effects of the higher frequencies.

Entire 198 Page Study link:

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/690012/EPRS_STU(2021)690012_EN.pdf

Related Posts

lastest-post-main-image Shocking short Video on how many Starlink Satellites have gone...
lastest-post-main-image
5G
How to protect yourself from 5G radiation?
Wireless technology is constantly evolving. About every ten years, technological companies introduce a new generation...
lastest-post-main-image
5G
2020 Live & Planned 5G Cities
This is not a complete list but if you are wondering where 5G will be...
lastest-post-main-image
5G
CHD Sues FCC to Stop New Rule That Could Lead...
Great news... despite this article predicting a nightmare of new 5G radiation, we believe it...
lastest-post-main-image
5G
Cities, towns, & countries which have BANNED 5G so far
We'll first say that we are NOT trying to ban 5G because we believe that...
lastest-post-main-image
5G
A Huge Court Win On 5G – A Must Read
READ ABOUT THE IMPORTANT COURT WIN ABOUT 5G: IMPORTANT NOTE: EMF Solutions does NOT protest...
lastest-post-main-image Blood Changes using Cellphone in 3 minutes
lastest-post-main-image HUMAN CELL & EMF STUDY –> Huge News!! Lab proves...
HUGE NEWS!This study shows the root cause of how EMFs effect human cells. Products by...
lastest-post-main-image 24 Hours On a Cell Phone = 1,600 Chest X-Rays...
STUDY - 24 HOURS ON A CELL PHONE = 1,600 CHEST X-RAYS???  Could This be...
lastest-post-main-image Does cell phone radiation affect our brain’s activity?
The pandemic and the subsequent lockdown have increased our dependence on phones more than ever....
lastest-post-main-image Over 1,800 EMF Studies Conclude: “EMF’s Are a Global Epidemic”
The BioInitiative is a group of scientists and Environmental Group Leaders from all over the...
lastest-post-main-image Electric Cars & EMF Radiation: Could Your Tesla Be Bad...
The first parts of this are written by an outside source... the solution at the...
lastest-post-main-image What some Physicians think about Wi-Fi in Schools… might surprise...
There is a wonderfully growing consensus among professionals that says that Wi-Fi should not be used...
lastest-post-main-image Radiation From Wireless Devices May Cause Breast Cancer, New Study...
What we at EMF Solutions' know about many EMF studies is that EMF's have been...
lastest-post-main-image Cell Phone, WiFi Router & other EMFs hurting your Mast...
EVERYONE is being affected by EMFs, getting DNA damage, and more, but some people are...

Get a Free Home Test

Contact us regarding any concerns or inquiries.

"*" indicates required fields

Country*